A report, 'An Economic Impact Assessment of Bovine Tuberculosis in South West England', highlighting the economic impact of Bovine Tuberculosis (TB) to the South West’s farming industry has been produced by experts at the University of Exeter. The research, which looks at the financial implications of the disease on a cross-section of livestock farms across the region, was carried out by Dr Allan Butler, Dr Matt Lobley and Professor Michael Winter of Exeter’s Centre for Rural Policy Research. It reveals that the monthly loss of a bovine TB breakdown varied considerably from farm to farm, from just under £505 to nearly £3,184. It also highlights perceived issues by farmers over variations in the current compensation scheme, which they believe can lead to a 'mismatch' between compensation payments and market value.
Dr Matt Lobley, Acting Director at the Centre for Rural Policy Research at the University of Exeter said: “This research has revealed considerable variation across a range of different types of costs associated with bovine TB. Consequently average figures, either for costs or calculating compensation, obscure much of the detail at an individual farm level. “Furthermore, in addition to economic losses, bovine TB is imposing considerable costs on the personal well-being of many farm households and also raises profound livestock welfare issues.”
Research for the report, including in-depth interviews with farmers, was carried out from March to September 2010, using case studies of both dairy and beef farms in the South West that have been impacted by the disease. It suggests that the current chart-based compensation system - derived from sale data obtained from store markets, prime markets, rearing calf sales, breeding sales and dispersal sales in Great Britain, rather than individual animal valuations – fails to reflect the perceived value of stock. It suggests that farmers that breed and manage high-value stock are likely to be under compensated, whereas farmers with cattle perceived in the market place to be of lower than average quality, expressed in terms of price, are likely to be over-compensated - a situation one farmer described as ‘inadequate’ and ‘farcical’. Although the focus of this study was on economic impacts, it also illustrated the stress and upset that bovine TB can bring to the farming industry, with farmers sometimes feeling like ‘bystanders’, which can be upsetting for them and their families.
